Eight years after his death, claims surface that Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat did not die of natural causes. Laboratory tests reveal that there were traces of the radioactive poison Polonium 210 on his clothing and personal items. When he died on November 11, 2004, Polonium 210 was virtually unknown. No tests were carried out at that time and it only became a news item two years later - in 2006 - when former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko was poisoned with it and died in London. Litvinenko was a critic of Russia and had earned the enmity of the Kremlin.
It will be almost impossible to name the person responsible for Arafat's death because he had far more enemies than friends. At the time, he was a virtual prisoner in his West Bank headquarters. He was primarily responsible for the Intifada and the resulting Israeli blockade had him pinned down and unable to travel.
Arafat was a commanding figure in the long running dispute between Israel and the Palestinians. The west regarded him as a terrorist and initially he was revered as a hero by the displaced Palestinians, but his dogmatic refusal to compromise saw several promising peace plans wither and die. In the end, many of his former followers thought his time had passed and he was no longer relevant. Enemies gathered on both sides of the political debate and nobody was surprised when he suddenly suffered a massive brain haemhorrage and was airlifted to a French military hospital.
This Polonium revelation will throw the spotlight on other suspicious deaths. Polonium 210 is a radioactive substance so deadly that an amount too small to be seen with the naked eye is inevitably fatal. Before tests to reveal it's presence were devised, it would have seemed the ideal way to remove a troublesome high official or eliminate a rival. The finger of suspicion will be pointed at many deaths that involved the sudden demise of people holding or seeking high office.
It will also heighten fears held by world leaders. The risk of assassination is always present, but now the risk is increased to throw suspicion on the members of a leader's inner circle. Will we see a return to the medieval practice of the chef being forced to taste the dishes put before a leader to guarantee the absence of poison ?
It is said " Uneasy lays the head which wears a crown ". In an age when the leaders of commercial industry collect salaries measured in millions of dollars - the exponential line of succession has incentive to speed that process !
Saturday, 7 July 2012
Friday, 6 July 2012
Ducking for cover !
It would be any householders worst nightmare ! To be woken in the middle of the night by bright electrical flashes from appliances and the smell of something burning. To be in the dark with no light - and the expectation that worse was to come.
That was the situation on Sunday night in two streets in the Wollongong suburb of Austinmer. The electricity supplier describes it as " an over voltage at a pole mounted sub-station ". What that means is a transformer that reduces high voltage to house power failed and allowed thousands of volts to run through the system, frying the motors and wiring of fridges, televisions, computers - all the household electrical equipment,
It seems that the company that supplies electricity is far from generous when it comes to compensation and making good the damage done. Residents are instructed to make a claim on their insurance company, but if they are not insured or their company rejects the claim, they will evaluate the situation on a " case by case " basis, and award restitution on a " depreciated value " basis.
Most insurance polices these days have abandoned " depreciated value " and replaced it with a " new for old " clause. Under " depreciated value " the age of the damaged item is taken into account, If an item is deemed to be half worn out, then the reimbursement is for just half it's value. The owner is deemed to be " no worse off " because the item has already delivered half of what was originally paid for. This ignores the fact that the owner will be deeply out of pocket and forced to make an unplanned purchase to regain the former standard of living.
This damage goes far beyond the replacement of electrical items. If the house wiring has been subjected to a massive surge of electrical current the overload may have caused " hot spots " in the wiring that will continue to deteriorate - and may lead to a house fire. Owners would be wise to have a qualified electrician run wiring tests to determine the risk.
This incident seems likely to deteriorate into protracted negotiations between the electricity supplier and the residents involved. Most residents will probably have no problems getting the damage covered by their insurers but as was evidenced by floods in recent times, there are insurance companies who will fight tooth and nail to avoid making legitimate payouts.
This tends to reinforce the wisdom of making careful decisions when buying insurance. The cheapest price is not the best criteria. The wise carefully evaluate the reputation of the company they intend dealing with and it would be a good idea to ask a few questions to try and determine it's past performance in settling claims.
That was the situation on Sunday night in two streets in the Wollongong suburb of Austinmer. The electricity supplier describes it as " an over voltage at a pole mounted sub-station ". What that means is a transformer that reduces high voltage to house power failed and allowed thousands of volts to run through the system, frying the motors and wiring of fridges, televisions, computers - all the household electrical equipment,
It seems that the company that supplies electricity is far from generous when it comes to compensation and making good the damage done. Residents are instructed to make a claim on their insurance company, but if they are not insured or their company rejects the claim, they will evaluate the situation on a " case by case " basis, and award restitution on a " depreciated value " basis.
Most insurance polices these days have abandoned " depreciated value " and replaced it with a " new for old " clause. Under " depreciated value " the age of the damaged item is taken into account, If an item is deemed to be half worn out, then the reimbursement is for just half it's value. The owner is deemed to be " no worse off " because the item has already delivered half of what was originally paid for. This ignores the fact that the owner will be deeply out of pocket and forced to make an unplanned purchase to regain the former standard of living.
This damage goes far beyond the replacement of electrical items. If the house wiring has been subjected to a massive surge of electrical current the overload may have caused " hot spots " in the wiring that will continue to deteriorate - and may lead to a house fire. Owners would be wise to have a qualified electrician run wiring tests to determine the risk.
This incident seems likely to deteriorate into protracted negotiations between the electricity supplier and the residents involved. Most residents will probably have no problems getting the damage covered by their insurers but as was evidenced by floods in recent times, there are insurance companies who will fight tooth and nail to avoid making legitimate payouts.
This tends to reinforce the wisdom of making careful decisions when buying insurance. The cheapest price is not the best criteria. The wise carefully evaluate the reputation of the company they intend dealing with and it would be a good idea to ask a few questions to try and determine it's past performance in settling claims.
Thursday, 5 July 2012
Search for the " Higgs Bosun " !
The mysteries of science intrigue many people. Usually, the objective being sought can be clearly understood. Perhaps a cure for cancer ? Perhaps unlocking the hydrogen content of H20 to give us cheap car fuel ?
A story from Europe leaves most of us bemused. The world's top scientists have spent hundreds of million of dollars creating a twenty-seven kilometre tunnel under the land on the border of France and Switzerland. This is called the " Large Hadron Collider " and it's purpose is to speed particles of matter in opposite directions until they reach nearly the speed of light - and then smash them together in a head-on collision.
Science admits that it is not clearly certain what will happen. Some people think that there is a possibility of setting off a chain reaction similar to nuclear fusion, while others think this could create more " Black holes " in space and these could endanger planet earth.
So - why are they doing this ? What do they hope to discover ?
It seems that they are looking for the " Higgs Bosun ". This seems to reach back into the very laws of physics that existed at the time of the " Big Bang " that created the universe. Current theory has it that at the moment of that colossal explosion a physical change occurred that gave some particles of matter their mass.
Without mass, matter can not exist. It has to have some form of substance - and that substance is termed - mass.
In 1960, Physicist Peter Higgs developed a theory that something that became known as the " Higgs Bosun " momentarily appeared for a fraction of a second and conferred the missing mass, and then disappeared. Science hope that using this Large Haldron Collider to create a mini replay of the Big Bang may prove or disprove that theory.
The strange thing is that this Higgs Bosun will not actually be seen. It is far too small to be visible to the naked eye, even through the amazing tools of reproduction that exist today. Science will be satisfied if it can be sensed, thus proving the theory and allowing research to make sense of the universe and decide what constitutes " Dark Matter " !
Now, here is another mystery ! What is " Dark Matter ? " Like the Higgs Bosun, it is something that can not be seen, but science think that it makes up most of the universe. The planets swim in a sea of dark matter and it contains numerous " black holes " that suck the life out of anything that approaches.
At that point, most of us mere mortals shut our minds down and go back to playing :" Dungeons and Dragons ". Hopefully, one day one of the gaming companies will convert the Higgs Bosun into some sort of computer game. Until that happens, it is better that we do not know what is happening deep under the turf of the French border. The workings and mystery of the Large Haldron Collider and the people in white coats who work it is far beyond the world in which we live !
And we thought computer games were scary !
A story from Europe leaves most of us bemused. The world's top scientists have spent hundreds of million of dollars creating a twenty-seven kilometre tunnel under the land on the border of France and Switzerland. This is called the " Large Hadron Collider " and it's purpose is to speed particles of matter in opposite directions until they reach nearly the speed of light - and then smash them together in a head-on collision.
Science admits that it is not clearly certain what will happen. Some people think that there is a possibility of setting off a chain reaction similar to nuclear fusion, while others think this could create more " Black holes " in space and these could endanger planet earth.
So - why are they doing this ? What do they hope to discover ?
It seems that they are looking for the " Higgs Bosun ". This seems to reach back into the very laws of physics that existed at the time of the " Big Bang " that created the universe. Current theory has it that at the moment of that colossal explosion a physical change occurred that gave some particles of matter their mass.
Without mass, matter can not exist. It has to have some form of substance - and that substance is termed - mass.
In 1960, Physicist Peter Higgs developed a theory that something that became known as the " Higgs Bosun " momentarily appeared for a fraction of a second and conferred the missing mass, and then disappeared. Science hope that using this Large Haldron Collider to create a mini replay of the Big Bang may prove or disprove that theory.
The strange thing is that this Higgs Bosun will not actually be seen. It is far too small to be visible to the naked eye, even through the amazing tools of reproduction that exist today. Science will be satisfied if it can be sensed, thus proving the theory and allowing research to make sense of the universe and decide what constitutes " Dark Matter " !
Now, here is another mystery ! What is " Dark Matter ? " Like the Higgs Bosun, it is something that can not be seen, but science think that it makes up most of the universe. The planets swim in a sea of dark matter and it contains numerous " black holes " that suck the life out of anything that approaches.
At that point, most of us mere mortals shut our minds down and go back to playing :" Dungeons and Dragons ". Hopefully, one day one of the gaming companies will convert the Higgs Bosun into some sort of computer game. Until that happens, it is better that we do not know what is happening deep under the turf of the French border. The workings and mystery of the Large Haldron Collider and the people in white coats who work it is far beyond the world in which we live !
And we thought computer games were scary !
Wednesday, 4 July 2012
The " Pop-up bar " concept !
New South Wales eased it's draconian liquor laws to encourage cafes to serve wine with meals and to encourage small, intimate bars to compete with the big clubs and old hotels with their decors little changed from the old days of the " Six O'Clock swill ". Getting a liquor license used to be a time consuming and costly journey through the labrynth of red tape.
This law change opened the doors for bright people to try new concepts, and one of these was the " Pop-Up bar " idea that found favour in many other places. It involved the creation of a temporary venue that existed for a short period of time - usually somewhere between eight and sixteen days, and which presented an interesting theme to create " buzz " and pack in the customers. This time around the Pop-Up bar might present an art show. Next it might be the turn of somebody's contemporary music to arouse it's followers interest. The idea was to be always " different " - and never go " stale " because it always existed for just a short period of time.
Unfortunately it has run into problems here in Wollongong. To succeed, the organizers need to find a constant stream of available venues scattered across the city, and not all of these are suitable or meet the standards required by the licensing laws. One of the stumbling blocks revolves around the expected number of patrons. What would be suitable for a gathering of a dozen people might pose a huge danger if well over a hundred turned up, and that would bring into focus matters such as the number and location of exits, the buildings fire safety arrangements - and if liquor is involved - provision of toilets.
Usually a Pop-Up bar creates a fill-in while a building is between leases or is awaiting structural modification. It may have previously been a shop or perhaps offices, but this new concept most likely packs in a vastly greater number of patrons - and brings it under new planning rules. Obviously, it would be uneconomic to create new entrances, meet fire safety standards and install additional toilets for the short period it would be a bar - and which would not be necessary when it reverts to it's former use.
There is a tendency to hope that the consent authorities will lower the rules because of the short nature of the intended use, but this would be a huge mistake. A fire disaster can be both sudden and catastrophic . A crowd trying to escape and finding their way barred by an exit door swinging inwards can result in multiple deaths, The loss of electricity powering lights can leave people confused and helpless when lit exit signs are not provided, and the very structure of buildings has an impact on how they would perform in a fire scenario.
The Pop-Up bar concept is a great idea. Now it rests on the ingenuity of it's proposers to think through the obstacles and custom fit the concept. Perhaps there are not enough suitable indoor venues in this city and it would be better served in an outdoor setting, great in summer and served by those mobile gas heaters common in alfresco dining areas in winter.
Obstacles are simply challenges those with brighter minds overcome on their path to success !
This law change opened the doors for bright people to try new concepts, and one of these was the " Pop-Up bar " idea that found favour in many other places. It involved the creation of a temporary venue that existed for a short period of time - usually somewhere between eight and sixteen days, and which presented an interesting theme to create " buzz " and pack in the customers. This time around the Pop-Up bar might present an art show. Next it might be the turn of somebody's contemporary music to arouse it's followers interest. The idea was to be always " different " - and never go " stale " because it always existed for just a short period of time.
Unfortunately it has run into problems here in Wollongong. To succeed, the organizers need to find a constant stream of available venues scattered across the city, and not all of these are suitable or meet the standards required by the licensing laws. One of the stumbling blocks revolves around the expected number of patrons. What would be suitable for a gathering of a dozen people might pose a huge danger if well over a hundred turned up, and that would bring into focus matters such as the number and location of exits, the buildings fire safety arrangements - and if liquor is involved - provision of toilets.
Usually a Pop-Up bar creates a fill-in while a building is between leases or is awaiting structural modification. It may have previously been a shop or perhaps offices, but this new concept most likely packs in a vastly greater number of patrons - and brings it under new planning rules. Obviously, it would be uneconomic to create new entrances, meet fire safety standards and install additional toilets for the short period it would be a bar - and which would not be necessary when it reverts to it's former use.
There is a tendency to hope that the consent authorities will lower the rules because of the short nature of the intended use, but this would be a huge mistake. A fire disaster can be both sudden and catastrophic . A crowd trying to escape and finding their way barred by an exit door swinging inwards can result in multiple deaths, The loss of electricity powering lights can leave people confused and helpless when lit exit signs are not provided, and the very structure of buildings has an impact on how they would perform in a fire scenario.
The Pop-Up bar concept is a great idea. Now it rests on the ingenuity of it's proposers to think through the obstacles and custom fit the concept. Perhaps there are not enough suitable indoor venues in this city and it would be better served in an outdoor setting, great in summer and served by those mobile gas heaters common in alfresco dining areas in winter.
Obstacles are simply challenges those with brighter minds overcome on their path to success !
Tuesday, 3 July 2012
A " Holy " Civil war !
The United Nations Security council has been careful to describe the bloodshed in Syria as a clash between " dissidents and the government ". It has avoided describing what it really is - a clash between two branches of the same religion.
Bashar al Assad's ruling party consists of the lesser Sh'ite numbers in the Syrian population and the militants are in the more numerous Sunni sector which is trying to overthrow a regime that imposes religious rule to which they are opposed. This is the worst kind of war - a " Holy " civil war !
The west is being condemned for it's lack of action to separate the combatants and sadly 15,800 people - many of them women and children - have lost their lives in the eighteen months that fighting has been waged. The Americans have stood aloof from involving their military muscle and both China and Russia have used their Veto to block meaningful sanctions or outright intervention.
Arms and munitions have been pouring into Syria from adjoining countries and International envoy, Kofi Annan has done a good job in preventing this becoming a larger dispute involving religious fighters widening the clash. Syria is surrounded by Muslim countries composed of both factions of Islam and it could easily flame out of control and involve the entire Middle East.
The bitterness and loss is too deep for the present aim of getting the government and the dissidents to agree to form a composite administration to succeed. It seems that all the west can hope for is that this civil war reaches some sort of final conclusion without drawing in the remainder of the Middle East. Eventually, a victor will emerge and in all probability that victor will install a cruel despotic rule on the vanquished.
It could go either way. Assad has a well equipped army but the dissident numbers have shown no sign of disarray, despite intense shelling and murderous forays by militia's loyal to the government. The opposing forces are becoming better armed and the trickle of Syrian army personnel defecting to the dissidents is becoming a flood. In many cases the only thing stopping this defection from widening is the fear that harm will be used against the families of those who defect across religious lines.
Distressing as it is to see a country torn apart, the most dangerous thing the world can do is to interfere in a religious war. Religion does not obey the rule of common sense. In the long history of planet earth, the millions of people who have perished in it's countless wars were usually of opposing religious persuasions.
Along with politics - religion is the most divisive force on the planet !
Bashar al Assad's ruling party consists of the lesser Sh'ite numbers in the Syrian population and the militants are in the more numerous Sunni sector which is trying to overthrow a regime that imposes religious rule to which they are opposed. This is the worst kind of war - a " Holy " civil war !
The west is being condemned for it's lack of action to separate the combatants and sadly 15,800 people - many of them women and children - have lost their lives in the eighteen months that fighting has been waged. The Americans have stood aloof from involving their military muscle and both China and Russia have used their Veto to block meaningful sanctions or outright intervention.
Arms and munitions have been pouring into Syria from adjoining countries and International envoy, Kofi Annan has done a good job in preventing this becoming a larger dispute involving religious fighters widening the clash. Syria is surrounded by Muslim countries composed of both factions of Islam and it could easily flame out of control and involve the entire Middle East.
The bitterness and loss is too deep for the present aim of getting the government and the dissidents to agree to form a composite administration to succeed. It seems that all the west can hope for is that this civil war reaches some sort of final conclusion without drawing in the remainder of the Middle East. Eventually, a victor will emerge and in all probability that victor will install a cruel despotic rule on the vanquished.
It could go either way. Assad has a well equipped army but the dissident numbers have shown no sign of disarray, despite intense shelling and murderous forays by militia's loyal to the government. The opposing forces are becoming better armed and the trickle of Syrian army personnel defecting to the dissidents is becoming a flood. In many cases the only thing stopping this defection from widening is the fear that harm will be used against the families of those who defect across religious lines.
Distressing as it is to see a country torn apart, the most dangerous thing the world can do is to interfere in a religious war. Religion does not obey the rule of common sense. In the long history of planet earth, the millions of people who have perished in it's countless wars were usually of opposing religious persuasions.
Along with politics - religion is the most divisive force on the planet !
Monday, 2 July 2012
Journey to a far star !
Voyager 1 has become the longest travelled object launched from planet Earth. It is about to leave the Heliosphere, the outer edge of our solar system, having passed by and photographed Jupiter and Saturn and passed through the Kuiper belt of asteroids.
This 722 kilo satellite was launched by NASA on May 5, 1977 and has now travelled eighteen billion kilometres.. It has survived long past the expectations of the scientists who designed it and there are expectations that it will continue to send radio messages back to earth until about 2025 when it's power source is likely to finally fail. Radio messages from that distance take sixteen hours to reach us here.
When it's battery power fades to zero Voyager 1 will continue it's journey at sixteen kilometres a second - forever ! A few centuries ago, people thought the earth was flat and mariners setting out on voyages of discovery feared reaching the end of the world - and dropping off the edge. Today's scientists think the cosmos is still expanding after it's creation in " the big bang " and therefore Voyager 1 will never run out of new space to explore.
In centuries yet to come this man made object will continue it's travels and it is possible that one day it will be captured by the magnetic pull of a distant star. Perhaps it will be pulled into orbit around a planet such as our earth or land safely on it's surface due to a lower force of gravity.
We are capable of imagining a host of different scenarios. If life exists on that far star it could range from a sophistication far beyond our best and brightest, or it could be life at the lower end of the journey of evolution. Voyager 1 could be laughed at as a simplistic experiment from a early attempt at understanding science - or as a message from the Gods - to be venerated and used as the focus of prayers.
At least we know that if our civilization becomes extinct by either a nuclear world war or our refusal to heed the messages this ailing planet is sending, at least Voyager 1 will be somewhere in the cosmos giving testimony that human beings once existed !
This 722 kilo satellite was launched by NASA on May 5, 1977 and has now travelled eighteen billion kilometres.. It has survived long past the expectations of the scientists who designed it and there are expectations that it will continue to send radio messages back to earth until about 2025 when it's power source is likely to finally fail. Radio messages from that distance take sixteen hours to reach us here.
When it's battery power fades to zero Voyager 1 will continue it's journey at sixteen kilometres a second - forever ! A few centuries ago, people thought the earth was flat and mariners setting out on voyages of discovery feared reaching the end of the world - and dropping off the edge. Today's scientists think the cosmos is still expanding after it's creation in " the big bang " and therefore Voyager 1 will never run out of new space to explore.
In centuries yet to come this man made object will continue it's travels and it is possible that one day it will be captured by the magnetic pull of a distant star. Perhaps it will be pulled into orbit around a planet such as our earth or land safely on it's surface due to a lower force of gravity.
We are capable of imagining a host of different scenarios. If life exists on that far star it could range from a sophistication far beyond our best and brightest, or it could be life at the lower end of the journey of evolution. Voyager 1 could be laughed at as a simplistic experiment from a early attempt at understanding science - or as a message from the Gods - to be venerated and used as the focus of prayers.
At least we know that if our civilization becomes extinct by either a nuclear world war or our refusal to heed the messages this ailing planet is sending, at least Voyager 1 will be somewhere in the cosmos giving testimony that human beings once existed !
Sunday, 1 July 2012
Cracking the whip !
Some councils are in the habit of introducing draconian rules that they have no intention of actually implementing. They are there as some sort of reserve in case a problem develops that needs fixing to keep the ratepayers happy.
Such seems to be the case in Kiama with it's " Short Term Holiday Rental policy. " Many years ago, when land was cheap and council rates were low, many Sydney people owned a holiday cottage at Kiama. It seems that one in every five Kiama homes now has an absentee owner and that one thousand five hundred of these dwellings are available for short term holiday rental.
The council has decided to completely bar pets accompanying people on these rental holidays. This seems to be an edict that ignores the owners wishes and would prevent family or close friends from taking their pets with them when holidaying with the owners consent. It seems a strange outlook in an age when health experts praise the benefits that a well loved dog or cat brings to the health of elderly people.
Another embargo concerns the number of people permitted to occupy a rental house. This is restricted to six adults and opens an interesting can of worms. Is the council saying that only six people can be on the property at any time, or is more than six permitted if the person renting decides to hold a BBQ for visiting friends ?
Perhaps the rule that will cause the most angst is the requirement that a sign be erected on the fence of each rental property proclaiming it as such and including a phone number which must be contactable on a twenty-four hour basis. Once again, this ignores the wishes of owners and could result in many unwanted approaches from people wanting to book future rentals.
It seems evident that this is a control measure that the council hopes to be able to invoke in the event of noisy, drunken parties or loud music that disturbs neighbours. In such instances, control is in the hands of the police, not the owner of the property and council is mixing the reach of administrative control with that of criminal policing. The police have no duty to count heads and insist on a council by-law being obeyed. That is a civil matter that council would need to properly channel through the courts.
Home owners in Kiama have the right to object to this policy on the grounds that it is heavy handed and will be offensive to many people. In particular, many owners will strongly object to their property being branded as a rental property for all to see. That seems an invasion of personal privacy and an intrusion on each owner's right to keep income sources from becoming public knowledge.
There will be a doubt whether all aspects of this new policy are within council's legal right to enforce !
Such seems to be the case in Kiama with it's " Short Term Holiday Rental policy. " Many years ago, when land was cheap and council rates were low, many Sydney people owned a holiday cottage at Kiama. It seems that one in every five Kiama homes now has an absentee owner and that one thousand five hundred of these dwellings are available for short term holiday rental.
The council has decided to completely bar pets accompanying people on these rental holidays. This seems to be an edict that ignores the owners wishes and would prevent family or close friends from taking their pets with them when holidaying with the owners consent. It seems a strange outlook in an age when health experts praise the benefits that a well loved dog or cat brings to the health of elderly people.
Another embargo concerns the number of people permitted to occupy a rental house. This is restricted to six adults and opens an interesting can of worms. Is the council saying that only six people can be on the property at any time, or is more than six permitted if the person renting decides to hold a BBQ for visiting friends ?
Perhaps the rule that will cause the most angst is the requirement that a sign be erected on the fence of each rental property proclaiming it as such and including a phone number which must be contactable on a twenty-four hour basis. Once again, this ignores the wishes of owners and could result in many unwanted approaches from people wanting to book future rentals.
It seems evident that this is a control measure that the council hopes to be able to invoke in the event of noisy, drunken parties or loud music that disturbs neighbours. In such instances, control is in the hands of the police, not the owner of the property and council is mixing the reach of administrative control with that of criminal policing. The police have no duty to count heads and insist on a council by-law being obeyed. That is a civil matter that council would need to properly channel through the courts.
Home owners in Kiama have the right to object to this policy on the grounds that it is heavy handed and will be offensive to many people. In particular, many owners will strongly object to their property being branded as a rental property for all to see. That seems an invasion of personal privacy and an intrusion on each owner's right to keep income sources from becoming public knowledge.
There will be a doubt whether all aspects of this new policy are within council's legal right to enforce !
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)