It is the job of a court of appeal to " second guess " the ruling of a trial judge in the light of " changed circumstances ". What those "changed circumstances " mean is open to interpretation. In many cases it seems that a change in public attitude caused by the passage of time is sufficient reason to vary the sentence given. Such a case is now before the court.
On November 7, 1973 two young men kidnapped a woman from an isolated farmhouse and over a period raped, tortured and eventually murdered her. When they were caught and put on trial the judge ordered suppression of the evidence because the details were " too grisly " to appear on the public record. That suppression order still stands.
The judge described the ordeal suffered by the victim so extreme that the perpetrators were " worse than animals ". The statute of " death by hanging " having been removed from options - he delivered the harshest penalty available to him - to be held in prison - " Never to be released ".
One of these murderers - now 64 years old - has gained the right to have his sentence reviewed. Under the " Truth in sentencing " law of 1989 he was automatically eligible for parole in 2003, but each request has been denied. Now that denial will be questioned at law.
This is a matter which will raise a very mixed reaction from the public. Many people will resent interference with the decision of a judge who heard the evidence - and lived with the anguish of those who attended the trial. Others will rightfully claim that we must review punishment from time to time - and that if extreme punishments such as hanging and flogging are removed from the statute books, then perhaps " never to be released " has long passed it's " use by date ".
Whatever the outcome, it will still deliver anguish for many. There are relatives of the prisoner who would welcome his release - and there are relatives of the victim who can never forgive the terrible crime he committed.
What we will never know - is to what extent that perpetrator now feel remorse !
No comments:
Post a Comment