An interesting tug of war is developing over the fate of Saif Al-Islam, heir apparent to slain Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. The rebels who overthrew the dictatorship insist that he be tried in a Libyan court in Tripoli, are facing demands from the International Criminal court that he be surrendered for trial in the Hague.
It seems a clear jurisdiction divide. The rebels fought long and hard to defeat a regime that delivered tyranny to the Libyan people. They suffered the death of thousands - many innocent women and children - and when Muammar Gaddafi was captured emotions ran high and he was apparently executed on the spot. That same fate did not happen many days later when tempers had cooled - and his son was captured.
The International Criminal court bases it's demand that Saif Al-Islam be handed over to them on the magnitude of the crimes committed by his family. It puts " crimes against humanity " higher on the list than mere " murder " .
The sticking point for most Libyan people will be the scale of punishment available to the International Criminal court. Execution is not an option - and if Saif Al Islam is convicted the most he will serve will be life imprisonment - in a gaol that meets the standards imposed by the " civilized " countries of the world.
The mood is Libya is to see those who imposed death and terror - and looted the Treasury to indulge in personal luxury - punished by a death sentence. The scale of punishment is surely a matter for each individual free country - and the people of Libya have suffered greatly to achieve just that status.
This seems to be a case where " local law " takes precedence over the International Criminal court !
No comments:
Post a Comment