Controversy over the wearing of the burqua bubbles on. On the one hand there are people who demand the " right " to indulge in religious practice even when it conflicts with the law - and yet the law in Australia supersedes religious custom.
For instance, those whose religion insist that they wear a turban are not allowed to use this as a reason for not wearing a helmet when riding a motorcycle - or even a humble push bike.
In many eastern countries saffron robed monks walk the streets begging for their daily food. Would this be permitted in Australia - or would the police crack down ?
The law here requires anyone entering a bank to remove items that cover their face - and this includes motorbike helmets. In fact, we have laws that make it a crime to cover the face to avoid detection in a criminal sense. Once again, religious custom and the law come into conflict.
One matter concerning the burqua has just been resolved. A woman giving evidence in court must remove the burqua because the jury is entitled to observe her facial expression to decide if she is telling the truth.
Unfortunately logic will not please everyone. There are those who will insist that religion must take precedence over the law - and others that the law is paramount.
The logical outcome would be compromise. Leave the burqua as legal in most circumstances, but demand that it be removed in instances where the law specifically so requires - such as entering a bank - being identified in respect of the photo license the wearer is proffering - or giving evidence in court.
Unfortunately the law and religion are as easily mixed as oil and water !
No comments:
Post a Comment